uhoh7 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
rscheffler wrote:
Charlie, the trees certainly do look plenty sharp. You're using the first version of this lens, aren't you? If so, it's interesting to see that the 'mid zone dip' character is very similar to my second version copy, that pretty much goes away by f/5.6.
My feeling is the ski lift image you previously posted from with the CV35/1.4 is a bit mushier at the very fine detail level. Do you remember what aperture you used for that image?
It's early days so you could be right, but check the lift detail etc. It was a snap, taken fast, mainly to check corners. I'd guess f/8 min, it could even be f/16!
Neither shot is a fair test really, check the shadows with the lift, you can see I'm not far off the sun, and for the 1.2 it's fully overcast.
However there is no mistake at f/1.4 in the shots above. VG sharpness for such an aperture.
We already the 1.2 is very good. But it's pretty big. I just want to be sure those interested know the 35/1.4 looks extremely viable.
As to colorcast, I am not seeing it with either lens, but it can be subtle, as you know.
|