Upload & Sell: Off
Robin Smith wrote:
$2000 for a camera that doesn't natively fit my lenses - it's not exactly cheap? As what pixel count Canon may come up with - how much do you really need, and how do you know what they plan anyway? Of course, if the most important thing is chasing the latest, greatest pixel count, you are already on a hiding to nothing - I don't see it making any discernible difference to the final results. Not that I don't understand it, as there is always the pleasure of new toys...
Dude, if we were truly chasing the latest and greatest pixel count, we would be shooting Nikon since February 2012. And besides, it's not all about the pixel count. For me it is more about the image quality at base ISO, and this is where Canon has truly failed lately, while the competition has leaped forward.
Cut the BS and accept that different photographers have different needs. I've waited long enough for Canon.
You're all writing about how well suited it is for our EF lenses, but I haven't seen any adapters announced? What am I missing? Are we just assuming that there will be good quality adapters? Or...
There already are.
One of them can be seen in this video around 11:25.