JustinPoe Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
guyharrison wrote:
For my landscape work, the 2.8 is less important so it looks like the 80-400 has the edge, for me.
What was your previous Canon lens? I had the 70-200mm f/4L (non-IS) and that really spoiled me with how light and small it was. The Nikon 80-400 feels like quite a beast every time I pull it out of my bag. I feel like when I go backpacking, that lens is 50% of the weight of all my camera gear combined.
Don't get me wrong, I'd take the Nikon 80-400 over any lens in the Canon 70-200 line-up any day, however, it is substantial in size in relation. So, just something to keep in mind.
I might end up grabbing Nikon's 70-200 f4 VR for my longer back-packing trips.
|