sebboh Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
millsart wrote:
Go figure....
Well, save for low ISO shooting I don't think there will be too much IQ difference in that case as higher ISO noise/NR will likely blur away any extra resolution edge the AA-less camera might have.
Lack of AA makes perfect sense on a DSLR like a D800e, which is a system camera and has a wide range of glass to appeal to landscape shooters and basically anyone else who wants maximum detail, as does it being a 36meg sensor.
Lack of AA on a fixed focal length camera that I doubt many people are buying as a specialized landscape tool seems a bit odd though.
I certainly might take a few landscape shots with it, as it is a great lens/sensor and could work well, but overall, I bought it more for the ability to shoot natural light, and a handheld street camera with good subject separation.
Did that many people really request that feature ?
Tilt screen, better AF, built in EVF, wider/longer focal lengths....yeah but who was crying out to lose the already very weak AA filter ?
...Show more →
didn't you buy a sigma fixed lens camera for landscape? i bet an AA free rx1 would produce better landscape shots than the dp2m in addition to being a much better general use camera (and $2000 more expensive). i'm not terribly fond of the foveon hdr look though.
i think i recall a few people complaining that there was an AA filter when this came out. i agree it would be better if they put the 36mp sensor in there to go with it, but i bet this will outperform every FF camera except the d800e (with certain lenses) for landscape at 35mm.
|