ytwong Online Upload & Sell: Off
|
douglasf13 wrote:
The NEX lens lineup has come a long way, and I don't really consider it to be weak point, at this stage, especially if you also count the native Sigma and Zeiss offerings.
ZA 24 1.8 is my first NEX lens, I'd hesitate to put my money to Zeiss NEX lens again (ok, that is a Sony x Zeiss lens, I know). I feel much happier to spend on their Z line.
Lack of stabilization on Zeiss lens is an issue to me when I travel (although I do carry a CF tripod when I travel).
Long lens offering is VERY weak.. the 55-210 is their best long lens for NEX and my 2nd copy is not still very sharp at f11 ( 1st copy sent to Sony and they said they have tested the 2nd copy before sending to me, after some argument about "within tolerance" with them)
My cheap Nikon 75-150 3.5 (via an adapter), is MUCH better than the 55-210, but it's a little difficult to focus with it handheld (at some settings, it can focus past infinity and then the quality is really poor). I'm considering to get a 200 f4 for NEX (I do have 180 2.8 but it is too big and heavy).
I wish they Sony will make a faster and better mid-range zoom. I don't need 2.8, and I could live with 3.5-4.5 (ok, constant f4 would be good too), just don't make 3.5-5.6 the only option.
And we have limited selection on native mount macro lens.
IMO, they should put more efforts on lens (and the camera user interface, which I really hate).
|