Sven Jeppesen Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
p.1 #9 · p.1 #9 · Review: Canon 35 f/1.4L vs Sigma 35 f/1.4 DG HSM | |
Malux wrote:
Here's the updated "Construction" paragraph text:
Construction
Both lenses are well-constructed and neither feels "cheap", though the Canon's construction feels more robust than the Sigma's. The Canon also has the magical L red ring that lets lets every photographer in the immediate vicinity know you're sporting a "pro" lens. It won't make your photos any better, but they don't know that. Kidding aside, if your lens choice depends greatly on survivability, go with the Canon. The build quality is what you'd expect from an L Lens: solid. Another thing to factor-in here is Canon's reputation for repairs vs. Sigma's. Sigma has made strides to improve service, but it's hard to beat Canon's factory repair (especially if you're a Canon Professional Services member)
Notwithstanding, the Sigma 35 does not come across as a cheap second-rate lens as Sigmas tend to. The lens is very well-made and its metal-plastic exterior with satin finish is well-executed. It looks, and feels, like a high-end product....Show more →
Everyone else in this thread belive the Sigma is better build or at least equal in build And what about this text in your Review
"Both lenses are well-constructed and neither feels “cheap”, though the Canon’s construction feels more robust than the Sigma’s. The Canon also has the magical L red ring that lets lets every photographer in the immediate vicinity know you’re sporting a “pro” lens."
|