johnctharp Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Wahoowa wrote:
If I had to start over with some limited budge (but still enough), I'd probably have just gone with 6D with 24-105L or 35L.
6D + 24-105L did it for me. I don't do sports/BIF/PIF, so I didn't feel the need for higher frame rates; it was the much better dynamic range and far lower (and less obtrusive) noise, coming from a 60D.
The kit lens is also a nice surprise; it's shorter than my 15-85 on the 60D, but still very sharp and reasonably ergonomic; and cheap as hell when bought with the kit. I quickly decided to keep it instead of trying to sell it and move to a faster 24-70. If I need a faster wide-angle, I have the 24/2.8 IS and 40/2.8 STM, both of which make great walk-around lenses.
If I had to add anything to the 6D kit, it'd be a telezoom of some sort, but I'm still torn on that one and putting up with my 70-300 IS USM. Wonderful lens at it's wide end, but weak on the tele end. I can't see finding a replacement for it outside of the L version or the 100-400L.
|