Larate Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
Gunzorro wrote:
I'm curious how you will find 1) the sides/edges, 2) distortion (barrel and pin-cushion), along with 3) color fringing.
I'm sure it will be a ton lighter and smaller, so you are going to achieve your objectives in that, no matter what!
I would say it depends on the scene, the motives of the photographer and ultimately how old is the captain :')
Let's assume a static scene in low light. For that scene, having a "descent" speed and "descent" ISO would require to fully open the aperture of the Canon zoom (so f/2.8). What can one do with the Tamron zoom ? Obviously, if IQ is important, s/he has to forgot to shoot wide open. But thanks to the lens' VC, s/he could close the aperture one or two stops (to raise the IQ up to the Canon's level) and still have a "descent" speed without bumping the ISO.
Please, don't misinterpret my words. I don't want to teach you anything (I'm sure I would learn a lot from you). Actually, my real question is "what's the best between a not optimal but stabilised lens and a better lens stabilised with a tripod ?". Until now, I always carried on several primes and a tripod with me. But I don't think that's the definition of a walk around lens ! Well, that's what my back is telling me !
Sorry for telling loud what is driving me insane :')
|