Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
  

Archive 2013 · Zoom lens advice
  
 
SEMiller
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · p.2 #1 · Zoom lens advice


rddayton wrote:
Good morning,

You said you are shooting your daughter's soccer and gymnastics so I am approaching my answer as a sports shooter. Probably 90 percent of what I shoot involves a ball, a bat, a stick or a puck.

With that being said, the best lens to shoot sports is the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8. VRI or VR II is up to you. I have owned both, but went back to the VRI and shoot it on the VRI on my D3s and D300 and have never had any issues (some say there are vignetting problems with the VRI on the full
...Show more

Thank you for your advice.I agree completely and I would love to have the 70-200 f2.8 VRII, but cost is one of the factors (I cannot justify (unless I win the lottery) the $2,400.00 price. While the $1200--$1500 range is not cheap either, it is more palatable, which was why I was considering either a non-Nikon f2.8, but people have said that they are neither as sharp nor focus as fast; or the VRI but have been read it does not focus as fast as the VRII or the f4) and size is another factor, (with many commenters saying the f2.8 it's a burden to carry around).

Also, right now it's daytime soccer and the place where she does ballet is decently lit. I have read that the D7100 has excellent low light resolution, under these circumstances, with the f4 how horrible would my results be if I pushed the iso up to compensate?

I could be completely wrong about all of this by the way (except the cost), I'm trying to analyze all the factors as best as I can to come up with the best choice for me.

Thanks again, everyone for this discussion.



Jun 11, 2013 at 04:32 PM
rddayton
Online
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #2 · p.2 #2 · Zoom lens advice


SEMiller wrote:
Thank you for your advice.I agree completely and I would love to have the 70-200 f2.8 VRII, but cost is one of the factors (I cannot justify (unless I win the lottery) the $2,400.00 price. While the $1200--$1500 range is not cheap either, it is more palatable, which was why I was considering either a non-Nikon f2.8, but people have said that they are neither as sharp nor focus as fast; or the VRI but have been read it does not focus as fast as the VRII or the f4) and size is another factor, (with many commenters saying the
...Show more

In your situation, there is no need to consider the VRII. It is a little smaller than the VRI -- and perhaps the focus is a little faster, but for the age group you are shooting, you won't ever know the difference. As for the costs, you will see the VRII lens selling used for $1800-$2000 -- and I agree that's overkill for your needs. The VRI version is widely available in the $1200-$1500 range -- and I seriously doubt you will see ANY difference between the VRI and VRII for your usage. The third party 70-200 2.8 lenses (most notably Tamron & Sigma) are significantly less money (i.e. $500-$700) but it is here that you will see a huge drop off in the image quality, focus speed, contrast, etc.

Here's another option. It's what I did as I was building my kit. I purchased a used Nikon 80-200 f/2.8 AF-D. There are three versions of the lens.

1) The old push-pull version
2) The AF-D
3) The AF-S

I never owned the push-pull because I don't like that zoom mechanism. The AF-S is supposed to focus a bit more quickly and will work on lower end Nikon cameras, but it is notorious for the focus motor squeak (and ultimately failure resulting in an expensive fix.) The good news is your D7100 has a built in focus motor which means you will have not problem using the AF-D version of the lens. You can find it for sale in the $600-$750 range. It does not have Vibration Reduction, and you lose 10 mm at the short end at the zoom range but it is a major upgrade over the third party options and will save some $$$$ over Nikon's 70-200 optioins.

To summarize, I would argue your best long-term bet is a used Nikon 70-200 VRI. A lower priced back-up plan would be to find a nice clean used 80-200 AF-D. If you have any more questions shoot me a PM, and I'd be happy to help answer questions.

Rick



Jun 12, 2013 at 10:39 AM
Palmguy
Online
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.2 #3 · p.2 #3 · Zoom lens advice


SEMiller wrote:
Thank you for your advice.I agree completely and I would love to have the 70-200 f2.8 VRII, but cost is one of the factors (I cannot justify (unless I win the lottery) the $2,400.00 price. While the $1200--$1500 range is not cheap either, it is more palatable, which was why I was considering either a non-Nikon f2.8, but people have said that they are neither as sharp nor focus as fast; or the VRI but have been read it does not focus as fast as the VRII or the f4) and size is another factor, (with many commenters saying the
...Show more

The VR2 may focus faster, but the VR1 still focuses pretty dang quick.



Jun 12, 2013 at 11:53 AM
SEMiller
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #4 · p.2 #4 · Zoom lens advice


A used lens is certainly an option but my concern (which I did not mention earlier) would be the lack of warranty verses 5 years for new.


Jun 12, 2013 at 04:20 PM
1      
2
       end




FM Forums | Nikon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Retrive password