Upload & Sell: On
Dawei Ye wrote:
I find this post quite offensive. All posters were responding to your question in good faith. Your arrogance and sense of entitlement is astounding.
Given that you were willing to forgo the 35L based on user reviews of it, it clearly doesn't sound like you really need it. I'd save your money.
Really? offensive? On an Internet forum? Ok. I guess? Entitlement? I'm not seeing it.
New to FM. I do see that. Welcome OP! He asked about Canon 35 and those who have reported on their love of the Sigma, I understand. Many just want to have their narrative and that's fine. Really it's how FM functions. We are not perfect, yet much good information may be found here. Is it helpful to the OP, after he specifically stated, not interested in the Siggie, I'm paraphrasing. Probably not helpful.
I understand apprehension with Sigma. I have owned both the 50 1.4 and 85 1.4 from Sigma. Initially, each performed well. The 50 began a back focus issue and the 85 just missed from time to time, not all the time. It would go several gigs working well and the mis focus would return. Yes, both have in for service at Sigma.
To the OP. I really like my 35. It's better on my 5D3 than ever before. It is a solid performer, I really enjoy the images taken with the 35l. I believe it is worth the price of admission. In any event, get one in-hand and see the results yourself.
Again, welcome to FM, we are sort of an Internet, on- line, dysfunctional family.
For the the record, I'm at the " dys" end of the bell curve.