andyjaggy82 Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
I decided I was never going to get over my curiosity about the Merrill cameras until I tried one out. Despite the consensus that most of the magic resides in the DP2 and DP3 cameras, I decided to go with the DP1 Merrill since it has the focal length I am most interested in.
I am always hesitant to post camera comparisons because of the flak you sometimes receive. Did you make sure you had super duper focus enabled? I wouldn't compare anything on a manfrotto tripod, you really need to be on a wood tripod that has been aged for 73 years in 24 degree temperatures in a cave in France. Were Venus and Saturn fully aligned? However in this case I thought it might be useful for others to see the results, since I searched for a similar comparison without much luck.
First the actual camera. I was really impressed with the feel of the camera. The camera is a great size and it feels very solid and well built in my hands. The focus ring is nice and silky smooth. I found the button layout and interface very intuitive. Within 10 minutes of having the camera I knew how to do everything I needed to do. No complaints about the actual camera here. Battery life is of course pretty sad, file sizes are quite large, and write times to the card are ridiculously slow, but if you are interested in these cameras you already knew that.
First I took the camera to the zoo to see how it functions as an actual every day camera. Overall I was quite pleased, it was extremely nice to not lug around my huge SLR, I found myself taking more pictures simply because it was easier to haul a little camera around. Again I was surprised how much I liked the functionality of the camera, the lack of options and fancy features kept me from being distracted fiddling with stuff. Auto focus was not bad, though in hindsight, the camera consistently focused on the background instead of my kid. I contribute most of this to user error.
Here are some shots, along with 100% crops of those shots.
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/polar_bear_full.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/monkeys_full.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/polar_bear_crop.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/monkeys_crop.jpg
I am incredibly impressed with the quality coming out of this camera. The lego brick detail on the polar bear shot blew me away.
Next I decided to compare this camera against my 7D + 17-55 f2.8 lens. Tripod mounted, both cameras set to f8, both cameras set to ISO 100, Mirror lock up on the 7D, remote released, manual focused on both cameras, etc..... The 7D files were downsized to match the Sigma, using bicubic sharper. Below are 3 100% crops. The sigma shot, the unsharpened 7D, and the sharpened 7D.
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/crop1_sigma.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/crop1_unsharpened.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/crop1_sharpened.jpg
Yikes. At this point I was feeling pretty lousy about my 7D. The Sigma absolutely blows away the 7D. The sharpened version is better, but the Sigma is still the clear winner. The way it resolved the detail in the fence and chicken wire blew me away.
Later I realized I had forgot to turn off IS on my lens, which I thought might be adversely effecting the image quality of the 7D. I decided to do another test. Below are 100% crops of a second shot. The sigma shot, the unsharpened 7D, and the sharpened 7D.
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/crop2_sigma.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/crop2_unsharpened.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/crop2_sharpened.jpg
And another section of the image.
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/crop3_sigma.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/crop3_unsharpened.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/crop3_sharpened.jpg
Overall I think the results in this one are slightly more even. The 7D seems to hold up a bit better, and the sharpened version brings it much closer to the quality of the Sigma file. to my eyes the Sigma is still the clear winner though, not to mention the 7D files require such a heavy dose of sharpening to get them close the Sigma files, that you really start to accentuate the noise in the 7D shots, you can especially see this in the white fence area.
Unlike the DP2 and DP3, The DP1 suffers from some softening in the corners, simply because of the nature of wide angle lenses. Here are 2 corner crops, I will let you draw your own conclusions.
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/sigma_bottomleft.jpg
http://andysportfolio.com/external-files/merrill_compare/sigma_bottomright.jpg
I did a few test shots to see how well it handled flare. It was decent, not as good as my 7D, but not as terrible as I was expecting. You get some green flare bubbles in the frame.
My conclusion.
First, it confirms how soft I have always felt the 7D is. I actually wonder if there is something wrong with my 7D.... I would say it might be the lens, but these results are pretty typical not matter what lens I am using, and I have pretty nice lenses.
Second this is an incredibly impressive camera. I was a bit worried that the DP1 wouldn't have the magic that I have seen in DP2 shots, but I think it holds it's own. I was pleasantly surprised at how much I enjoyed shooting with it. It has quite a few limitations so I won't be getting rid of my 7D anytime soon. The most impressive thing to me is that you can get this amount of image quality in such a small package, it is absolutely going to be my backpacking/long hiking camera. I think the D800 would beat it, or even the 5D III with a really good lens might slightly best it, but as far as IQ/Portability it's unbeatable in my opinion.
|