Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2013 · RAW post processing sharpening - 5D mark III
  
 
Yaniv
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · RAW post processing sharpening - 5D mark III


How much do you usually sharpen your RAW file in photoshop CS5?
Using the 25% default value I get soft images and i usually go up to 50%-60%

Am i missing something?



May 13, 2013 at 03:01 AM
dgdg
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · RAW post processing sharpening - 5D mark III


You are not providing any detail about your photos. Your issue could be anything from technique, lens, camera, and/or post processing.
For productive help, you should to provide example photos with exif data.



May 13, 2013 at 03:18 PM
colinm
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · RAW post processing sharpening - 5D mark III


50 or 60 on the Sharpness slider is really, really high on an in-focus image. Example photos would definitely be helpful.


May 13, 2013 at 03:26 PM
Yaniv
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · RAW post processing sharpening - 5D mark III


OK here we go:

This is with the default 25% settings:
25%

This is with 65%
65%



May 14, 2013 at 12:43 AM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



dgdg
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · RAW post processing sharpening - 5D mark III


Both look just fine to me! I'd move on....


May 14, 2013 at 02:44 AM
Beni
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · RAW post processing sharpening - 5D mark III


I use 75,1,30,0 in ACR as a starting point but then that's all the sharpening I do. The amount is going to change drastically depending on your radius and detail.


May 14, 2013 at 08:14 AM
jhg photo
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · RAW post processing sharpening - 5D mark III


In ACR of CS6, I am routinely using 50, 1, 25-40, 20-25.
Very high ISOs like 6400 especially when underexposed seem to benefit from less sharpening and larger radius and more masking, e.g., 35-40, 1.5-2, 35, 30.
On print, the all look far better than on screen.



May 14, 2013 at 08:57 AM





FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Retrive password