veroman Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
So, as promised, here's a comparison between my filterless Canon 500D, my Canon 5D Classic and my Fuji X10 ... i.e. a comparison between three very different types of camera designs: full frame, crop and small sensor "point and shoot"(although their resolutions are similar).
The big surprise here ... for me anyway, and as you'll see ... is the excellent performance of the Fuji X10. I've liked my X10 from Day One, but this is the first time I've ever compared it with anything, much less a 5D Classic!
Some things to note:
None of the images were sharpened.
The 5D and 500D used the same lens, my very sharp Tamron 28-75 f/2.8. In a reasonable effort to keep depth-of-field similar, I shot the 500D @ f/8, the 5D Classic @ f/11 and the X10 @ f5/6. My math is probably a bit off, but it seems to have leveled things.
All cameras were shot at ISO 200.
The 5D and X10 images were upsized to match the 500D, i.e. 4752 pixels wide. The X10 took to the interpolation really well. It hardly looks upsized at all, and if I hadn't told you so you probably wouldn't be able to tell.
The sun went in and out behind soft white clouds and was hard to keep up with. You'll see slight differences in shading and brightness, but not too much. Hey .... I can't control everything!
Here are the full scenes shot with each camera:
5D Classic
Fuji X10
500D
|