p.1 #1 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
Hello all,
what are your opinions-
assuming you're shooting two ff bodies, for weddings, would you rather...
35 + 70-200
OR
24-70 + 135
I'm just looking for opinions as to which range is more practical for the zoom. I assume that your shooting style may have something to do with this answers, but I'm just looking for some opinions!
p.1 #2 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
Since we're just offering opinions I'd go with the 24-70 + 135 (lighter and I prefer zoom at the wide end since there is so much more difference in focal lengths). I currently don't shoot with either of those lenses so YMMV.
p.1 #5 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
In regards to tobicus..
haha, you're not a jerk, I've thought about it, but I feel like (correct me if you disagree) starting out shooting weddings it may be good to have a nice zoom so you don't miss anything. Then when you're more adapted to shooting weddings and know what to expect, etc. it may be time to move to an all-prime kit?
p.1 #6 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
I mainly shoot video, but I am getting into photo as well (since I shoot with a DSLR a lot). Anyways, I operate with a 35 and an 85mm (groom and bride prep, reception) and a 135mm / 70-200 for the ceremony. I ONLY use the 70-200 for the ceremony. The 135 is an awesome lens for the reception or portraits if I have the time or space. I have a 24-70 but I am selling it and getting a 24mm at some point. I rarely use the lens :/. Primes are my favorite right now and I love moving around more with the lenses!
p.1 #7 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
I started with 24-70L and 70-200 2.8 IS, moved to 35 and the 70-200, then moved to 35 and 135. Now I am using 24-70 ii and 135 as my 2 main. I must say I like 24-70 II and 135 the best. I will still use 35 once in a while. It is mainly due to how awesome 24-70L II is.
p.1 #9 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
I just don't use 135 hardly at all unless I need to travel light and have something longer than 85...which is rarely the case. I either need 200mm or I don't need anything longer than 85mm.
I use 35 most often. Started using 50 sometimes and recognize some nice things about it, but I still prefer the feel and effect of 85.
35 is not wide enough for some things - mostly things that can be done with a 16-35.
p.1 #10 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
Just my .02 cents. Own both a 24-70 and 70-200. 70-200 used to never ever leave my camera. Seriously I once shot almost an entire wedding with it. Killed my arms but loved it. Now I only use the 24-70. Love it. When I need longer I find I only shoot 200mm now on the 70-200 (could have something to do with my 85mm too - which I love for certain things). So I would say go for the 24-70 for sure and the second lens think about it before taking the plunge. Maybe the 135mm but then again having both the 24-70 and 70-200 can't steer you wrong.
p.1 #11 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
I use the (Nikon) 24-70 and 70-200 for 95% of my wedding work. I really like my 85mm 1.8, but I am so used to the flexibility of the two zooms working together that I doubt I'll ever change.
If you really like primes, I would strongly consider using just the 35 and 135 together...
p.1 #15 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
One more thing comes to mind.
It may be very easy to choose between the 35 and the wide zoom...
the question is, do you want the look of 35/1.4 in terms of depth control, or you donīt. In terms of angle of fiew you can alway work around but you donīt get 1.4 depth of field with a 2.8.
p.1 #16 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
What heiko said. 35 shot wide open gives you a unique look. If you find yourself shooting it 2.8 or smaller all the time, then might as well get a zoom lens.
I actually love how 35 looks wide open. I often shoot it wide open when there is plenty of light. I did find myself not getting the framing I wanted to make the photo better. Thats why I moved to 24-70.
p.1 #17 · Which combo for weddings is more practical?
Interesting I found this thread. I have been mulling this over recently and making some changes.
Most of what I do at a wedding is between 24-70 so I would pick 24-70 + 135.
The 24-70 and 105 f2 DC is what I'm doing, but I will soon add a 35 f2, and the 180 2.8 and sell my 70-300 vr.
One advantage I see of the Nikon 35f2 is that close focusing distance. I'm thinking I could carry the 35 for close ups, instead of my larger macro lens.
I chose the 105 over the 85 or 135 because neither ever worked for me. The 135 was too long for my personal working distance and the 85 was too personal doing tight head shots.
I'm looking at the 35 as a prime to add to the 24-70 because it's lightweight, inexpensive, with unique characteristics. I have a 50 I never shoot but I think I'll shoot this 35.
