The dinosaur with the loooong neck looks like a Brontosaurus, now known as an Aptosaurus. I guess it was the angle that you took the picture from that caused the neck to look that long. Did you use flash on that picture?
or something like 16-35. For museum you need wide angle most of the time so I would not bother with long teles. Maybe and just as maybe I would take 85/1.8 or 105 macro
Hmm, a zoom would be best to get coverage, if you were doing a documentary shoot, but for the artwork, a 35 is most likely wide enough, but less distorted than the 28 or 24.
DaveOls wrote:
The dinosaur with the loooong neck looks like a Brontosaurus, now known as an Aptosaurus. I guess it was the angle that you took the picture from that caused the neck to look that long. Did you use flash on that picture?
No flash used at all. Also, angle was basically right under the front side of the dino. Contributing to trippy neck angle.
or something like 16-35. For museum you need wide angle most of the time so I would not bother with long teles. Maybe and just as maybe I would take 85/1.8 or 105 macro
16-35 would be perfect on FF. That's the equivalent of the 10-20 I used. And im sure a FF body wont be limited to ISO 800-1600 like I was on the D200.