Upload & Sell: On
| p.1 #4 · Nikon 16-35mm f/4G ED VR II OR 14-24mm 2.8 for Landscape |
Since you only asked for $0.02 worth here's mine, without knowing too much specifics regarding your preferences or priorities
14-24 if you want
need wider than 16mm
want lower distortion
16-35 if you want
save some $$$
VR is more useful to you than f2.8
less weight and bulk
the 24-35mm range matters more to you than the 14-16mm range.
For my priorities, I would pick 16-35. Disclaimer, I've never used either, just presenting my $0.02 based on many hours of thinking about replacing my 17-35. In the end I'm very happy with the 17-35 for what I shoot and cannot justify owning two UW zooms.
Sounds like a great trip lined up, all the best!