35 1.4 + 85 1.2 on two 5D III. Sometimes I will switch 35 1.4 for 24 1.4 and 85 for 135 2. I have the 70-200 2.8 II but only use it when I have to and try to avoid this lens due to weight and "pro look".
This is what I'll have for my first wedding in May:
Nikon 70-200 f4
Tamron 28-75 f2.8
Nikon 85 f1.8g
Nikon 50 f1.8g
Nikon 24-85 kit
Nikon 40 2.8 dx macro
D600
D7000
My biggest difficulty will be deciding which lenses to have on which cameras during the ceremony. The 70-200 will be my best lens, too long on my d7000 so I'd like to have it on my d600, but the 28-75 won't be as wide as I want on my d7000.
CMB Photo wrote:
Wonder, how many actually using fish more than once (at least) per wedding. Seems like our got covered with dust.
I've been trying to squeeze a fish in a bit more than just one shot. Recently presented a fish shot to one of my brides and had it rejected. She said I could delete it from the collection. I thought the shot looked cool; some of the people in the shot being highly distorted may have been the problem.
D. Diggler wrote:
I've been trying to squeeze a fish in a bit more than just one shot. Recently presented a fish shot to one of my brides and had it rejected. She said I could delete it from the collection. I thought the shot looked cool; some of the people in the shot being highly distorted may have been the problem.
was it a portrait of a Bride or what? How come they "reject" something...