Upload & Sell: Off
| p.1 #6 · p.1 #6 · What to use for WA on FX- CHOOSE OTHER IF YOU USE THE 16-35 VR ! |
You could also include the 16-35mm f/4 VR. But its drawback is that some say that w/ buildings, architecture, etc., things get "curved".
The drawback to the 14-24mm is that it can't take a circular polarizer filter. Yes, I know, they can have an uneven effect on a UWA lens in some conditions, but still, it's nice to have the option.
I had the 17-35mm... good glass, but no nano coating, in my estimation, made a difference that makes me look forward to an update. W/ its focal range, it certainly would be a good redundant/backup to my 24-70mm during weddings and...Show more →
Exactly, I had the 14-24 in previous time using Nikon but the lack of filter ring was a deal breaker for me.
Re: 17-35 - and how long have we been / will we be waiting for an update ? I have had one sof these also and it is certainly a tank of a lens.
16-35 f4 VR - not familiar but thinking it's just a cheap 17-35 ? not a fan of curved buildings