Upload & Sell: Off
| p.3 #6 · p.3 #6 · Canon 70-200 2.8L non-IS or Sigma 70-200 2.8 OS |
Put it this way, if money is no object then get Canon 70-200 L II, if it is then Sigma woud be sufficient. Would your client or prospective client know if you use either lenses? I don't think so, perhaps if you have a photo session and they ask what lenses are you going to use? Never had that kind of question in my semi professional experience. The end result is the most important thing.
I just got myself Sigma 70-200 OS yesterday and my initial test was impressive and for the price is even better. And with the extra money I save I can get another lens to play around. I spent less than $3.5k on my lenses and here's what i have Tamron 24-70 VC, Sigma 70-200 OS, Sigma 35/1.4 (awesome lens!), and sSigma 85/1.4 (another awesome lens). With Canon brand I won't get anything closer to the number I've spent.