Upload & Sell: On
So, um, I hate you guys. All this talk had me go down to my local shop and try out an X-E1. I also handled an X100, and I expect the X100s will handle like the X100, but with all the improvments in AF like the X-E1, which is great...except I had originally preordered the X100s with an eye towards using it as my pocket cam instead of keeping all my higher end m4/3 primes for a 'small' kit. Thing is, the X100 isn't that small...I realized I'd rather just use my GX1 with 14/2.5. So one good thing is that I realized I'd have made a mistake with the X100s, and when I got back, I cancelled my pre-order.
However...I really liked the X-E1. A lot. And darn it, I don't need two systems, except, I already have the money allocated for the X100s, and the files out of the X-E1 are really quite good. Heck, even the LR processing looked good for the most part (though I didn't shoot dense foliage, which is where I understand LR has problems with X-trans.)
And now, while I generally don't have a need for ultra-shallow depth of field (usually, I actually prefer a little more depth of field for things like portraits)...I'm imagining using my Rokinon 85/1.4 on the Fuji and having a 135mm equivalent type lens with super shallow DOF for those few times I want it, and the 35/1.4 for those few times I want shallower normal stuff plus just buying an adapter for the 85, and it's making me lean this way.
DARN YOU ALL!