Upload & Sell: Off
| p.4 #8 · Sony NEX vs. Olympus u4/3rds? |
I think the problem with sony is they didnt cater the advance enthusiast market too seriously. If at first they were releasing a 24 1.4, 35 1.4 and 50 1.4, I think they'll be market leaders by now.
With Zeiss also producing lenses for X mount, it becomes harder to pick Sony over Zeiss. Especially if the XE-2 has a tilt screen, PDAF and touch shutter.
I agree with this. The main factor in going with the Fuji vs. the NEX was the lens roadmap. I think Fuji really "gets it" when it comes to enthusiasts. Good lenses are for life. The lenses not only have wide apertures, but also very good sharpness, nice rendering, DOF scaling and ability to use autofocus or manual focus with good MF feel/turning range. Its like having your cake and eating it too-- leica quality optics + autofocus + IS (at least for some.) So, I overlooked the AF issue for that. In future bodies, they'll probably get the AF right. (The fuji sensor doesn't suck either.)