Bob Jarman Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
RustyBug wrote:
If you are referring to the yellow oof highlights ... I'm good with them being real.
Although, I might be inclined to consider it a composite image as I'm having a little difficulty with the one highlight that is "inside" the bottle opening.
The bottle opening is in sharp focus. The oof highlight is in the same plane as the bottle opening (by virtue of being inside it). If the light source that is creating the oof blur was in the same plane as the bottle, it would be a sharp light point (in the plane of focus), not a blurred oof light circle.
The "tell" is being able to "look through" the oof circle and see the other side of the bottle that gives us a definitive plane/location of that particular light point.
Cool composite, but I'm thinking the bottle should be blocking the oof, not the oof blocking the bottle....Show more →
Good eye Sherlock!
And I understand the nature of the question - ie "to photoshop verb, transitive" - one can argue, for entertainment if nothing else, that almost all digital images are photoshopped since any processing done is destructive in the sense that it (except for RAW) degrades from the original image. Or, they are "PSP'd, etc.
Bob
|