Upload & Sell: On
| p.3 #5 · DxOMark rates the new Canon EOS 6D |
Lasse Eriksson wrote:
As for lenses the Canon 400/2.8 II and Nikon 400/2.8 are rated worse than most consumer zooms..
Yep that makes sense!
The words ridiculous,rubbish and garbage come to mind..and im not talking about the lenses!
I don't look at their lens tests, but their sensor tests are done very well. Get past looking at their grade and look at the actual tests. They make perfect sense and the results line up with what is being experienced in actual images.
Why should we get past their grades if the tests are well done And why would they rate the D800 as much better than the 1DX for low light sport shooting if the tests where good
My point exactly.
The 1Dx obliterates the D800 as a low light sports camera, yet its out rated by a body with poor AF in comparison(and with issues)at best,no FPS(no buffer),no weather sealing,build etc...and i could go on and on and on.
A rating system based solely on sensor output only to grade cameras is SO flawed as to another forum which say only graded cameras based on AF performance.
Looking at the world through one eye makes it very non 3D that is exactly DXO.
Oh and did i mention the lens tests...
You are still hung up on their grading system. Throw that aside and dig into the actual tests. Maybe then you'll begin to see some actual useful data. If all you want is a number that somehow sums up a camera...then you get what you ask for. Dig deeper or just disregard. Complexities like cameras and sensors cannot be summed up in 1 number.
Either dig deep or give it a rest.