Upload & Sell: Off
| p.1 #12 · The-Digital-Picture 6D RAW Images |
fraga wrote:My experience as well, as the first one (early adopter) was quite good, the second one was worse.
But in my case, noticeably.
I was a fairly early adopter (January 2010). That 7D, like yours was the one that seemed to peform better. It was a grey import frm HK and it must have got sea sick on its way over because it's AF was only consistent in it's "randomness".
Anyway, I still find it near impossible for a 6D to have only a 1 stop high ISO performance advantage over even the best 7D copy ever produced. That doesn't sound right at all
He doesn't say "only one stop". He says "over one stop".
Realistically, should one expect any less? A questionable sensor that many have liked - and some hated - vs a 3-4 year newer FF sensor?
I didn't spend much time at all, but to my eyes, the 5d2 is looking *better* than the 6d at lower ISOs with less smearing (I checked up to 800). He suggests they're the same up to 400, but I'd rather deal with a little noise that I can selectively eliminate as opposed to an over all smearing.
It may be worth a little more time to verify, but then again, maybe not.