Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

  

Archive 2012 · Managing and Storing Photo Library
  
 
rdris
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · Managing and Storing Photo Library


I'm quickly running out of space on my macbook and I haven't been able to find a really optimal solution on how to move and store my photos on an external NAS but also keeping my Lightroom catalog intact.

For those of you with a large photo library how do you manage it? Do you delete all of the photos you don't like or move them onto a different drive and be done with it?

It seems it'd be a bit more tedious for me to have to go through all of my photos and delete the ones I didn't like (I never really flagged my photos in the past and usually just edited them if I liked it).

Also, once your photos are in a different location, how does your workflow change? Do you store them on your computer, edit, then transfer to a NAS? I'm kind of looking for an optimal solution that doesn't get too tedious in the long run.

Thanks



Oct 25, 2012 at 09:28 PM
Alan321
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · Managing and Storing Photo Library


I've ordered a Drobo 5D with thunderbolt and USB 3.0 access. It will give me speedy external storage for when my internal drives are too full to hold everything or just to hold the photos that I am less likely to want while my macbook pro is being used elsewhere as a portable. Most other external options will suffer from slow HDD speeds or slow interface speeds and will therefore slow down Lr.

So long as the external storage is on-line the work flow does not change because the one catalog still holds all of the photos. Also, the preview cache lets me see the external photos (but not edit them) even when they are off-line.

Just be sure to use Lr to relocate the files to other drives or folders or else the catalog will be compromised. The idea is to avoid splitting the photos into multiple catalogs because Lr searching can only be done to one catalog at a time, but know that a single catalog can cover multiple drives, whether on-line or off-line.


The time taken to cull photos is one reason why some people recommend that you don't do it - instead, spend the time on the good photos. Trouble is, the process of identifying the good photos takes just as long but you had to do it anyway.


I have recently started a new work flow that involves transferring the new photos to Lr via an auto-import folder on a speedy SSD, then doing the barest minimum image editing to allow me to judge how much I like the images as a first impression with little regard to image quality, and then applying a rating. Later I will apply a label that indicates how good or bad the images are and whether they are fixable or cannot be improved, etc. This takes more time than the rating process but because I have already used ratings to show which images I liked most I can use that to prioritize which ones I label first. Finally, I'll use the combination of rating and label to make smart collections that will instantly present the all-round best images, second best, etc. Other filters can narrow them down to relevant subjects, dates, gear, whatever.


Lr is based on a database and like all databases you get the best out of it only if you put the time and effort into feeding it with usable information. This means you should apply relevant ratings, labels, keywords and so on. In the short term this is certainly tedious but in the long term - once you catch up with your backlog of photos - Lr will become a far more friendly search tool that will seem more helpful than tedious.

Start with ratings and labels but first come up with a workable system - you only have five of each to play with. Then work on keywords. Start with simple, big-picture categories and refine them with more detailed info only if you need to. e.g. you could use "travel" as a broad category and rely on the image capture dates to find what you need, but if you need to pull out photos of a certain subject or trip then do so but also identify them with a new keyword and/or collection. The next time you need them they will be there instantly.

- Alan



Oct 29, 2012 at 04:59 AM





FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Retrive password