Upload & Sell: On
| p.1 #19 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II reviewed by Photozone |
Yakim Peled wrote:
The difference between this test and that of RC from LR is intriguing.
There's always a bit of variation between our results - some of it the difference in comparing raw to jpgs, and every Imatest setup a bit different.
However, when I look at Klaus' numbers, rather than his opinion, it's a really good lens. Much better than 24-70 numbers, at 24mm very close to 24 TSE or f/1.4 at similar apertures. My results showed it a bit better, his a bit worse, but both are close.
For the person who compared it to the Nikon, that's a lot of variables: lens, camera, sensor mircrolenses, and if jpgs were used in the Imatest process, difference in in-camera post processing. To compare the Canon and Nikon, we'd really have to put both lenses on an optical bench.