p.1 #1 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II tested by Roger Cicala
Read Roger Cicala's resolution test of the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II. This highly anticipated lens just hit the market and his results will surprise you. He compares it to the previous version as well as several other top lenses.
"This is short, sweet, and simple. The resolution absolutely, positively kicks butt and takes names. It is way better than the lens it replaces. It’s better at 70mm than the best Canon zoom I know of, the 70-200 f/2.8 IS II. It’s even better at 24mm than the sharpest 24mm prime we have, the Canon 24 TS-E. In the center, in the corners, it doesn’t care. We only had 5 copies to test, but they were all very similar with little copy-to-copy variation."
p.1 #2 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II tested by Roger Cicala
Canon is putting a lot of effort into lens updates that offer increased resolution across the frame... if I was a betting man, I would say this is in preparation for a new high resolution body.... Bring It On!
p.1 #9 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II tested by Roger Cicala
Like many others, at first glance I thought, "How dare they charge this much for this lens?"
But like the 70-200f2.8 v2 before it, the improved performance makes the price increase less controversial.
Like the 5D2 & 5D3 and 70-200f2.8 versions, Canon should offer both versions for those that can't afford the new premium. But it doesn't look like they'll do that, since the old version is no longer on their website.
Those that can't afford the new one, might want to snatch up the remaining stock of the original.
p.1 #12 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II tested by Roger Cicala
RobDickinson wrote:
"It’s even better at 24mm than the sharpest 24mm prime we have, the Canon 24 TS-E. In the center, in the corners, it doesn’t care."
p.1 #13 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II tested by Roger Cicala
Those resolution numbers are insane. I notice a significant difference in sharpness between my 70-200 f/2.8 IS II and my 24-70 and I would love to have my 24-70 be just as sharp, but not at $1,000 more. I'd rather invest in a fast L prime for variety.
p.1 #14 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II tested by Roger Cicala
Damn, I thought this lens wasn't going to be selling too well by the first initial reports causing a price decrease sooner than later, but with a review like this I dont see that happening anymore.
p.1 #17 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II tested by Roger Cicala
gvg45 wrote:
Damn, I thought this lens wasn't going to be selling too well by the first initial reports causing a price decrease sooner than later, but with a review like this I dont see that happening anymore.
Oh, I don't know. $2300 is still priced out of the range of most non-pros IMO, which surely limits its market (he says, wishfully
Sounds like a great lens, but Nikon also managed to produce a great 24-70 and price it $500 lower
p.1 #18 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II tested by Roger Cicala
The price will come down. This is the initial price, as with every other Canon product, the price comes down over time. Will not surprise me if Canon rebates this within 6-12 months.
p.1 #19 · Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II tested by Roger Cicala
SKumar25 wrote:
The price will come down. This is the initial price, as with every other Canon product, the price comes down over time. Will not surprise me if Canon rebates this within 6-12 months.
one store had it for $125 off for pre-orders, they are back to list now though
would kill for this lens I loved the old one this one kicks ass
