Upload & Sell: Off
| p.3 #2 · GH3 the fastest AF in the world ready to kick OM-D behind |
I agree generally about bigger camera/smaller sensor, but the overwhelming massive difference in weight savings for me has been the lenses. not the body. Yes, the OM-D body is small...but my crop body cameras weren't huge. However, good luck carrying a set of high quality AF 1.4/1.8/2 lenses on anything else. You'll double the weight, easily.
I could easily conceive of a m4/3rds shooter wanting a slightly beefier body and still being able to stick with the lens lineup.
Yes, I'm aware there are fairly small MF fast lenses available for every system - I've owned and/or used many of them. They still aren't light, though...and they don't autofocus!
If all you ever carry is a body and a slow-ish mid-range zoom, the difference is smaller, obviously. If you have a full kit, it's night and day.