Home · Register · Search · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Hendrik, Fred Miranda
Username   Password

FM Actions & Plugins support
Workflow Guidelines
  
FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell  
end
  
LR3 to LR4 OR PSE8 to PSE10?
Upgrade from LR3 to LR4
Upgrade from PSE8 to PSE10
Neither, wait and upgrade to CS6, but keep LR3
None of the above

Upgrade LR or PSE?
  
 
no_surrender
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


I'm running a Windows 7, 64 bit system.

Both option upgrades are $80. I'm not sure if either are worth it, but I'm starting to use a couple newer techniques for retouching portraits that my current software doesn't support, particularly PSE8. Are either of these upgrades worth the $80? A few sliders here and there? A channels panel to separate RGB for sharpening?

Thanks in advance.

Kevin



Aug 25, 2012 at 12:52 PM
mmurph
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #2 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


Both?

Adobe Elements 10 is $50 today only, 8/25:

http://mpex.com/adobe-one-day-deals




Aug 26, 2012 at 02:58 AM
Alan321
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #3 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


Do you want to manage your images as well as process them ? If yes then get Lr 4. I like the better processing engine and better collection management than Lr 3. However, also a bit slower.

If you're not into managing your images then you're free to pick any editor. I'm not familiar with PSE - does it do parametric editing like Lr does or does it always change the original file with the edits ? Does it matter to you ?




Aug 26, 2012 at 10:41 AM
no_surrender
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #4 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


Alan321 wrote:
Do you want to manage your images as well as process them ? If yes then get Lr 4. I like the better processing engine and better collection management than Lr 3. However, also a bit slower.

If you're not into managing your images then you're free to pick any editor. I'm not familiar with PSE - does it do parametric editing like Lr does or does it always change the original file with the edits ? Does it matter to you ?



Photoshop Elements changes the file each time it edits. I use both programs for different things. LR3 for basic exposure adjustments and PS8 for anything requiring work with layers.



Aug 26, 2012 at 12:15 PM
Rand47
Offline

Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #5 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


LR 4.1 is like getting a new camera for free. The processing pipeline is that much better.
The learning curve from 3x to 4x is significant - it's a completely different animal in the develop module - but it is worth the effort. There is no question in my mind that this is a better use of the money than PSE. I also have and use CS6 and can tell you that except for pixel level editing all of my PP is now accomplished in LR4.



Aug 26, 2012 at 02:10 PM
egd5
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #6 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


definitely Lightroom. Besides, I would guess that in a few months PSE 11 will be out, you can upgrade that then.


Aug 26, 2012 at 05:26 PM
 



RustyBug
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #7 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


LR never quite got the job done for me in the past, so I never bought it @ LR1, LR2 or LR3. LR4 ... I bought it. Very much worth it.


Aug 26, 2012 at 07:44 PM
no_surrender
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #8 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


Thanks everyone. I ordered LR4 from B&H for $58 with the student discount and it comes with a Kelby tutorial DVD...bonus! Can't wait!

Kevin



Aug 27, 2012 at 03:26 PM
abqnmusa
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #9 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


PSE does not handle 48 bit RAW as native 48bit. Makes it useless for RAW conversions.

I would use Lightroom or Photoshop
or DPP



Aug 27, 2012 at 03:33 PM
no_surrender
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #10 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


abqnmusa wrote:
PSE does not handle 48 bit RAW as native 48bit. Makes it useless for RAW conversions.

I would use Lightroom or Photoshop
or DPP


Looking into a trial version of CS6. I don't care much for DPP unless I want to go back and verify a focal point or something. To me, LR is useless if I'm going to use DPP anyway. I guess one could use DPP to process levels and tones in the RAW file then open in photoshop, but IMO LR is much better. Disclaimer, though, I don't know DPP well enough to say LR is better...it's just what I prefer.

Kevin



Aug 29, 2012 at 09:46 AM
dgdg
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #11 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


I bought PSE and never could get the images to look right. Something always seemed off. I bought LR4 and was quite shocked how nice the post processing looked and how little time it took. For removing things like telephone poles, etc, I do like PSE eraser tool quite a bit, but otherwise never use it.


Aug 29, 2012 at 12:16 PM
lesaus
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #12 · Upgrade LR or PSE?


abqnmusa wrote:
PSE does not handle 48 bit RAW as native 48bit. Makes it useless for RAW conversions.

I would use Lightroom or Photoshop
or DPP


Incorrect - PSE does handle 16-bit/channel raw files and a lot of the editting can be done in 16-bit mode. Some features, such as layers and spot healing, e.g., requires the file to be converted to 8-bit first. So, you do all that you can in 16-bit (levels, highlights/shadows, sharpening, etc.), then convert to 8-bit IF you need those 8-bit features.



Aug 30, 2012 at 01:00 PM
end




FM Forums | Post-processing & Printing | Join Upload & Sell

end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Lost your password?