bobbytan Offline Upload & Sell: On
|
I shot with the 5D II and OM-D just recently and didn't notice a difference in the file quality aside from some differences in color balance/temperature, and I explained why that was so. But other than that, I see no unusual difference in the image quality between these 2 cameras ... and they are both equally sharp too:
https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1172736/4#11492822
Jochenb wrote:
sangdabom, I also think there's a difference (I also own the 5DII with ZE lenses).
However, I think the difference mostly comes from the lenses. The Zeiss ZE lenses on FF are special. Colors, contrast, microcontrast, bokeh,... The m4/3 lenses are very good, but not at the same level IMHO. When I still used Canon lenses on my 5DII results also looked more flat.
BTW: I found the look of the RX100 files closer to my canon set. That sensor is even smaller than m4/3, but has a Zeiss lens in front of it.
I decided not to care too much about the rendering, because for me the OM-D is about speed, size and joy to use.
...Show more →
|