millsart Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
pokemon wrote:
The X100 seems great but i liked the IQ of the X2 more...
I don't mean this to sound rude at all, but if you can't answer for yourself the question of an OVF vs EVF, then how can you say you liked the X2 IQ more ?
Have you shoot with one ? Or a X100 for that matter ?
You state yourself that your not an accomplished photographer, which is fine of course, but then how do you know which camera is better, and especially how to do you what your looking for in terms of IQ ?
I had a X1, and currently still have an X100 (in addition the XPro) and the X100 was every bit as good as the X1, with a faster lens. The X100 is really on par with the XPro as well, which surely is as good as the X2 is going to be.
Make no mistake, the X2 looks good, but does it really have a marked advantage over the X100 ? I don't think so.
It seems to be a big improvement in terms of AF over the X1 which is great, but it should be too, its a $2000 camera after all.
Add on the EVF and its a $2500 camera! OVF, which gives no shooting info is about a $300 accessory.
Or you could buy them both, $2800 camera with a f2.8 lens, vs a $1200 X100 with a faster f2.0 lens.
Is the X2 really going to have $1600 of IQ advantage over the X100, and more so, are you really going to be able to see it ?
|