Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              55      
56
       57              302       303       end
  

Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread
  
 
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #1 · p.56 #1 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


For me, it's an absolutely HUGE improvement...brings the X-trans files in-line with the way ACR processes all other cameras, which to me looks very natural and non-digital. Just a giant leap in fine detail rendering and lack of artifacts.

Way to go Adobe...glad I held off buying C1....



Feb 26, 2013 at 02:17 AM
JustinZ850
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #2 · p.56 #2 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Jman13 wrote:
For me, it's an absolutely HUGE improvement...brings the X-trans files in-line with the way ACR processes all other cameras, which to me looks very natural and non-digital. Just a giant leap in fine detail rendering and lack of artifacts.

Way to go Adobe...glad I held off buying C1....


Now this is good to hear!!!



Feb 26, 2013 at 02:25 AM
veeresh.ai
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #3 · p.56 #3 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Jman13 wrote:
For me, it's an absolutely HUGE improvement...brings the X-trans files in-line with the way ACR processes all other cameras, which to me looks very natural and non-digital. Just a giant leap in fine detail rendering and lack of artifacts.

Way to go Adobe...glad I held off buying C1....



Thank you so much for the update Jordan, I am downloading LR now .



Feb 26, 2013 at 02:30 AM
Ssnycshoot
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #4 · p.56 #4 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Just got the camera last week. Love it so far. All shot with X-E1 with ZM 50mm planar with minimum or no PP.

1.


2.


3.


4.








Feb 26, 2013 at 02:45 AM
Brody LeBlanc
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #5 · p.56 #5 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Well, I'll be....


They Did It - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 Summicron & Speedbooster [LR4.4] by brodyl.91, on Flickr

Adobe got their shit together, it looks just as good as C1 I'd say.



Feb 26, 2013 at 03:31 AM
naturephoto1
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #6 · p.56 #6 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


I am re-posting the sunset photo that I posted several days ago (my first photo with my X-E1 with my Leica R 35-70 f4 Vario Elmar zoom lens). These were done quickly. The first was done through LR 4.3 and the second by LR 4.4.

Rich





Through LR 4.3







Through LR 4.4




Feb 26, 2013 at 03:45 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #7 · p.56 #7 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


You still need to pull down exposure a fair bit. You've blown the red channel pretty severely here...it may not be recoverable.


Feb 26, 2013 at 03:51 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #8 · p.56 #8 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


X-E1 with Canon FD 50-300mm f/4.5L and Canon 2x TC @ 600mm, f/16. Branches in the moonlight:







And a self portrait with the 35/1.4:







Feb 26, 2013 at 04:03 AM
naturephoto1
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #9 · p.56 #9 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Jman13 wrote:
You still need to pull down exposure a fair bit. You've blown the red channel pretty severely here...it may not be recoverable.


The image is underexposed and I didn't have time to use a reverse ND. I will post the original file as a JPEG. I don't have enough knowledge or experience at this point.

If you want to give it a shot, I would be interested in what you can do with this.

Rich







Edited on Feb 26, 2013 at 04:12 AM · View previous versions



Feb 26, 2013 at 04:09 AM
veeresh.ai
Offline

Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #10 · p.56 #10 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Here's one photograph of my nephew. Had shot this a while ago, went back to process it today. To be honest, the SOOC Jpeg was so good that I didn't bother processing the RAW. Yeah, the BG sucks, I should probably have managed it a bit better .




Feb 26, 2013 at 04:11 AM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #11 · p.56 #11 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


naturephoto1 wrote:
The image is underexposed and I didn't have time to use a reverse ND. I will post the original file as a JPEG. I don't have enough knowledge or experience at this point.

If you want to give it a shot, I would be interested in what you can do with this.

Rich


I'll give it a shot, but I can't do anything with a JPEG version...I'd need the RAW file to try and extract some detail in the blown channels.



Feb 26, 2013 at 04:14 AM
naturephoto1
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #12 · p.56 #12 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Jman13 wrote:
I'll give it a shot, but I can't do anything with a JPEG version...I'd need the RAW file to try and extract some detail in the blown channels.


Jordan,

OK. I only reduced the RAW file to a JPEG to upload the file. All of the information should be there to the best of my knowledge. If you can't work from that, how do I upload a RAW file to the forum?

Rich


Edited on Feb 26, 2013 at 04:30 AM · View previous versions



Feb 26, 2013 at 04:22 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #13 · p.56 #13 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


PMed


Feb 26, 2013 at 04:27 AM
Jman13
Online
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #14 · p.56 #14 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


You did blow the red channel a little bit too much for full recovery of data, but I got a lot more out of it. In lightroom, the highlight and shadow recovery sliders are your friends. The X-trans RAW files are calibrated so that they don't have quite as much highlight headroom as some other cameras, but the files have huge dynamic range, which means you can push the shadows a TON...so err on the side of underexposure. The red channel also clips a little earlier than the green and blue on this sensor. Wish Fuji would put in an RGB histogram.

Anyway, here's what I got with a few quick adjustments on the RAW:







Feb 26, 2013 at 04:46 AM
Brody LeBlanc
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #15 · p.56 #15 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Here's a couple more from LR4.4 & the Speedbooster using the Leica-R 35/2 (E55)


Background - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr


Viberg - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr


Sick Fro Bro - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr


Arriving - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr


Holy Mirrorshot - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr


Wired - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr


Nanana - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr


Finished - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr


Fish n' Chips - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr


Statue - Fujifilm X-Pro1 w/ Leica-R 35/2 by brodyl.91, on Flickr





Feb 26, 2013 at 04:52 AM
naturephoto1
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #16 · p.56 #16 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Jman13 wrote:
You did blow the red channel a little bit too much for full recovery of data, but I got a lot more out of it. In lightroom, the highlight and shadow recovery sliders are your friends. The X-trans RAW files are calibrated so that they don't have quite as much highlight headroom as some other cameras, but the files have huge dynamic range, which means you can push the shadows a TON...so err on the side of underexposure. The red channel also clips a little earlier than the green and blue on this sensor. Wish Fuji would put in
...Show more

Jordan,

Thank you. I knew I could pull more out of the shadow area and could have increased the exposure more. I just wasn't sure how far to go.

Rich



Feb 26, 2013 at 05:00 AM
naturephoto1
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.56 #17 · p.56 #17 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


I decided to go back and try my hand at this image again of the Sunset in front of my house in Pennsylvania taken with the X-E1 and my Leica 35-70mm f4 Vario Elmar lens processed with LR 4.4. I increased the vibrancy a slight amount more, opened up the shadow a slight amount more and increased the contrast a little.

I think that I like this rendering.

Rich







Feb 26, 2013 at 06:29 AM
ceder
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #18 · p.56 #18 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Well, DpReview compared the new Lightroom candidate to Capture One and out-of cam Jpg's here: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/1550547764/adobes-fujifilm-x-trans-sensor-processing-tested

Looks like LR is now much much improved, and has less artefacts than CaptureOne. LR may look softer, but really has higher resolution than CaptureOne. Silkypix 5 still has the least artefacts and the highest resolution, but LR has so much better highlight and shadow recovery, better user interface etc. A step in the right direction, perhaps it will be tweaked even further before full release?



Feb 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM
justruss
Online
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #19 · p.56 #19 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


Please, PLEASE, Apple-- give us RAW support. Shooting jpgs and editing in Aperture works fine (or at least I think my samples show that), but I'd love to get even more DR headroom via RAW, and not have to set up parallel workflows for my cameras.


Feb 26, 2013 at 10:07 AM
nibutto
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.56 #20 · p.56 #20 · Fujifilm X-mount Image Thread


LR4.4














Feb 26, 2013 at 08:29 PM
1       2       3              55      
56
       57              302       303       end




FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              55      
56
       57              302       303       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Retrive password