Home · Register · Software · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell


Archive 2011 · Difference in AF on 1-series bodies with f/2.8 vs. f/4?
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #1 · p.1 #1 · Difference in AF on 1-series bodies with f/2.8 vs. f/4?

What is the technical difference regarding AF operation with EOS-1 series camaeras and f/2.8 or f/4 lenses? Something about certain AF sensor functioning or partially functioning depending on max ap.

In practice, how much of a difference does the difference make, and which focal lengths are most impacted?

Dec 15, 2011 at 11:25 PM
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #2 · p.1 #2 · Difference in AF on 1-series bodies with f/2.8 vs. f/4?

Anyone know the answer?

Dec 17, 2011 at 05:11 PM
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #3 · p.1 #3 · Difference in AF on 1-series bodies with f/2.8 vs. f/4?

I think it is more up to the electronics in the lens then the F stop. The 17-40 F4 L focuses faster and responds faster then my 85mm F1.8. 1DII and 1DsII cameras.

Also, both focus faster then the 50mm F1.4 lens

Dec 17, 2011 at 05:15 PM
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.1 #4 · p.1 #4 · Difference in AF on 1-series bodies with f/2.8 vs. f/4?

There are extra focus points available to f/2.8 lenses on my 1D3 I believe.

Dec 17, 2011 at 05:20 PM

Search in Used Dept. 

• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #5 · p.1 #5 · Difference in AF on 1-series bodies with f/2.8 vs. f/4?

I think it depends on what 1series (not taking the new 1Dx system into account either) but there is a list somewhere that shows what f4 lenses

This from the mk4 page on TDP
"The 1D Mark II/N had 7, the 1D Mark III had 19, but the Canon EOS 1D Mark IV features 39 cross-type AF sensors that are functional during manual AF point selection (19 are cross-type functional with automatic AF point selection) with all f/2.8 and faster EF lenses as well as the following f/4 EF lenses:
17-40mm f/4 L USM
24-105mm f/4 L IS USM
70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM + Extender EF 1.4x II
200mm f/2 L IS USM + Extender EF 2x II
300mm f/2.8 L IS USM + Extender EF 1.4x II
400mm f/2.8 L IS USM + Extender EF 1.4x II
Cross-type AF sensors are sensitive to both horizontal and vertical lines of contrast and are twice as sensitive to vertical lines as horizontal lines. Meaning, they will often be able to obtain focus when a horizontal-only sensor may not. The center AF point functions as a high-precision cross-type sensor with lenses that have a maximum aperture of f/4 or wider. All focus points are horizontal-line-sensitive-only with variable aperture EF lenses (such as an f/3.5-5.6 lens).
All 45 AF points (including the center AF point) remain horizontal-line-detection-functional with an f/5.6 lens. Currently, only Canon 1-Series bodies can autofocus with an f/8 max aperture lens (typically a lens + extender combination). Only the center AF point is functional at f/8."

Dec 17, 2011 at 07:34 PM
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #6 · p.1 #6 · Difference in AF on 1-series bodies with f/2.8 vs. f/4?

Up to the 1D4 the 1-series cameras have 45 vertical AF sensors that detect horizontal contrast. They each respond at any aperture down to f/5.6, except that the centre one responds down to f/8. They work at all of the larger apertures too. They all work at standard precision which is within the defined depth of focus, which in turn is related to to depth of field but is not the same thing. It varies with lens maximum aperture and focal length)

At some of those 45 sensors there is also a horizontal linear sensor that detects vertical contrast. It operates at a higher precision of 1/3 of the depth of focus but in so doing it is less sensitive can only operate down to apertures of f/2.8 or perhaps f/4. The more central sensors are the ones that respond best at f/4.

Whenever and wherever the horizontal AF sensors are operating the vertical sensors are also operating and in effect you have a cross-type (+) sensor that responds to both vertical and horizontal contrast. A vertical linear sensor has great difficulty focusing on a vertical flag pole unless you rotate the camera, but a cross-type will always work.

In practice the extra focus precision may not matter (e.g. if you are shooting at f/8 the focus precision at f/2.8 or f/1.4 is not so critical because you have lots more DOF at f/8 to mask any focus errors) but the closer you shoot to maximum aperture (at which all AF is done) the more benefit you can expect to see when you have more precision.

The cross-type vs linear may or may not matter depending on what you are shooting. So long as there are clear lines of contrast crossing the linear AF sensor then it will focus ok. If there aren't any then it won't focus so well (if at all) and a cross-type would probably be better because it is sensitive to contrast in more directions at the same time. As a work-around you can rotate the camera to achieve focus and then put it back to where it belongs for the shot.

All focal lengths are affected. What matters are the size of the AF sensor relative to the image area and also relative to the subject. Canon do not publish how fine a detail the camera can focus on, and so if the subject is too small relative to the sensor then there may be insufficient contrast to focus on. This is most likely at short focal lengths or longer shooting distances. However, there is usually something to focus on even if it is only the outline of the subject rather than the surface detail of the subject.

Chances are that cross-type focusing will operate faster because it has two lots of contrast detection at work at each focus sensor position, and more accurately because of the extra vertical precision compared with the horizontal precision, or simply because a linear sensor may be blind to the subject detail.

With the 1D4 there are some lens/TC combinations that work with cross-type capability and precision at f/4 even at what are normally f/2.8 sensors. e.g. the 300 f/2.8 L IS + 1.4x TC, or the 17-40 f/4 lens by itself. This is great but not all f/4 lens/TC combinations can do this.

The new 1Dx changes things somewhat by using some x-shaped cross-type sensors, having cross-type at any aperture down f/5.6, and discarding f/8 AF completely. I haven't studied it in enough detail to comment on its AF precision at f.5.6.

Some non-1-series cameras offer cross-type AF all the way down to f/5.6 at some AF sensors. i.e. They do not revert to linear sensors at f/4, which is often a good thing. However, they do not offer the higher AF precision that you can get from the 1-series cross-type sensors. Pros and cons. On the 1-series cameras "cross-type" inherently meant "high precision" and the terms were sometimes used interchangeably but that does not apply to the non-1-series cameras.

Some cameras, whether 1-series or not, have AF sensors that can work with a greater level of initial defocus. This is quite a separate issue from precision or cross-type but is often very handy because it can help avoid time-wasting lens focus searches. It's mostly on the more modern cameras and is something to look for. e.g. it is not on a 1Ds2 but is on a 1D4 or I think even the 5D.

- Alan

Dec 18, 2011 at 03:33 PM
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.1 #7 · p.1 #7 · Difference in AF on 1-series bodies with f/2.8 vs. f/4?

ZoneV, the concise answer to your question is that Canon's 1-series cameras can switch between two sets of AF points. One set uses a longer 'baseline', and this gives more 'accuracy' to the focus. Canon states that the normal-precision AF points are 'accurate' to 1 DOF, whereas the higher-accuracy AF points are 'accurate' to 1/3 of DOF.

The aperture of the lens comes into play in terms of that 'baseline' F2.8 is a physically wider aperture. Think of it in terms of the width of the angle of light rays coming in thru the extreme left and right edges of the aperture. An F2.8 lens, wide-open, will result in a larger angle of light rays. I guess it's the same effect as a wide aperture has on bokeh...

In practical terms, I've never noticed a difference on my 1Ds, when shooting with the 70-200 F2.8 vs the 400 F5.6. Subjects are either in-focus, or they aren't. I haven't seen any statistical difference in percentages, even though the 400 is used alot for BIF's. That may also be due to the increase in DOF with the 400...

Dec 19, 2011 at 12:00 AM

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell


You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username     Reset password