Home · Register · Software · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2      
3
       4              6       7       end
  

Archive 2011 · 7D noise issue
  
 
Gochugogi
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #1 · p.3 #1 · 7D noise issue


I'm not any good at birds but I use a similar NR method as Tony for 7D high ISO images: Topaz Denoise 5 on background or sky and selective sharpening on important areas of the image. Works very well for both web and large prints.

http://emedia.leeward.hawaii.edu/frary/ala_moana_images/Ala_Moana_Vista_1613sign.jpg


http://emedia.leeward.hawaii.edu/frary/flora_fauna_images/Hibiscus_0099sign.jpg


http://emedia.leeward.hawaii.edu/frary/downtown_images/Door_handle_0101m.jpg


http://emedia.leeward.hawaii.edu/frary/downtown_images/Green_Meanies_2899sign.jpg




Edited on Dec 12, 2011 at 12:37 AM · View previous versions



Dec 12, 2011 at 12:34 AM
Pixel Perfect
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #2 · p.3 #2 · 7D noise issue


abqnmusa wrote:
With a 7D much of your time is consumed running noise removal programs to try and save images.
I found grainy ISO 100 shots unacceptable
Just too many tiny noisy pixels crammed onto aps-c sensor


At most I use a NR program to clean up a clear blue sky and it takes about 10s including the mask. I've usually got the image pretty good in LR3 or Capture One and if I can't I'll probably ditch it as I've stuffed up the exposure.

You may well have had a dud camera, but clearly most don't. At ISO 200 I only use 4 NR on luminance channel, 8 on chrominance data at most, same as my 1D III and 5D II.



Dec 12, 2011 at 12:36 AM
jorkata
Offline
• • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #3 · p.3 #3 · 7D noise issue


The 7D is one very special camera.
Itís very demanding - always requiring good exposure, lots of hand-holding, involved and committed noise reduction & sharpening, etc..

To make the story short, I couldn't take it and we broke up after just three days of ownership.
It was me, not the camera .

Good luck to those with more patience than me.



Dec 12, 2011 at 12:47 AM
BrianO
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #4 · p.3 #4 · 7D noise issue


jorkata wrote:
The 7D is one very special camera. Itís very demanding - always requiring...lots of hand-holding, involved and committed... To make the story short, I couldn't take it and we broke up... It was me, not the camera...


Hmmm. I think I'll name my 7D "Linda." (A long story I won't go into here. Let's just say I took a vow of celibacy some years ago. )



Dec 12, 2011 at 12:55 AM
RobertLynn
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #5 · p.3 #5 · 7D noise issue


BluesWest wrote:
+1, Robert: I agree with your sentiments completely.

Not clear to me why the 7D has been the target of so much misguided criticism, particularly with regard to noise. I've been using one since it was released and the "noise problems" are easily dealt with in post-processing. Blue sky noise, in particular, is removed in a second (literally) by using a masked NR layer.

I do agree that the photos I've seen from the 1DIV (a $4,500 camera) have superior IQ compared to photos from the 7D (a $1,500 camera). But in my opinion the IQ of the 7D is at least
...Show more
Funny, shortly after BrianO tried to make me out to be a son-of-a-gun, several people have all chimed in, pretty much saying what I've said. Then on top of that, imagemaster comes in and posts some absolutely amazing photography here to further solidify my point.

The 7D is an outstanding piece of equipment. While it's no D3x, 1D4 or 1DX, or even a 5D2/1Ds3 in the IQ department, it packs a hell of a punch.
Pixel Perfect wrote:
Actually are you aware there were issues especially with early builds that did require repair. My own camera was adjusted by Canon for excess graininess at low ISO and this was their own assessment; I just asked to check it out. But I've been overall very happy with the 7D and find it does much better than my 40D at high ISO an PP'ed properly is very good at lower ISO.

But I agree blanket statements made about it are ridiculous given the proof presented in countless photos. Sensible exposure and PP will yield good results.


I read about a few people on the forums having to send them in. While I've never seen a service announcement or anything like that to address any "known" issue with the camera. I'll see people who buy the camera off of the shelf like yesterday, and say that it's one of the early ones that is part of a "known" issue.

I have one that is just a few months old, and get pretty good use out of it. However, I have seen quite a few people on this forum alone that have had hardware issues. That's why when I say about people complaining about it, I include the "caveat" of hardware issue not-withstanding.

Jeff Nolten wrote:
Ok, I keep reading posts with images taken at ISO 800 or higher who claim there is no noise in their images. I don't believe it, I can find noise in 5D2 images at ISO 800. So here is an ISO 800 image of mine, the first is the full image, the second a 100% crop with default NR applied in the raw converter, and the 3rd a 100% crop of my finished image. There is noise, perhaps not bad, but noise. If you guys are getting noise free images like this then my camera is NG and has
...Show more

Whoever is telling you that 800 is noiseless is just as ridiculous as someone saying it's unusable at higher ISO's.

Any sensor will deliver some noise that you can find, even at low ISO. It's just the nature of the beast. I think though, that relative noise (meaning what we've had a few years ago to now) is pretty good on it at 800.

abqnmusa wrote:
With a 7D much of your time is consumed running noise removal programs to try and save images.
I found grainy ISO 100 shots unacceptable
Just too many tiny noisy pixels crammed onto aps-c sensor


Yeah, because it takes like a whole second to do some NR to an image in the same workflow as sharpening or other adjustments.

jorkata wrote:
The 7D is one very special camera.
Itís very demanding - always requiring good exposure, lots of hand-holding, involved and committed noise reduction & sharpening, etc..

To make the story short, I couldn't take it and we broke up after just three days of ownership.
It was me, not the camera .

Good luck to those with more patience than me.


I don't even understand this statement..I don't always have "good exposure", or a lot of "hand-holding" and any committed, dedicated noise reduction or sharpening to it, and get results that work just fine.

As far was work flow, I'm damn lazy when it comes to it, and if I'm getting pleasing results...



Dec 12, 2011 at 01:30 AM
BrianO
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #6 · p.3 #6 · 7D noise issue


RobertLynn wrote:
Funny, shortly after BrianO tried to make me out to be a son-of-a-gun, several people have all chimed in, pretty much saying what I've said.


It's not what you said; it's how you said it.



Dec 12, 2011 at 01:37 AM
RobertLynn
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #7 · p.3 #7 · 7D noise issue


BrianO wrote:
It's not what you said; it's how you said it.


I'll give you that "context" can be missed in type, but just about anyone on the planet that has more than 30 seconds of interaction with me knows that I'm the least malicious person on the planet. I believe that I've never, ever made a claim that I was better at anything than anyone at any given point of the day.

Perhaps I could've worded it in a lengthy fashion to say something along the lines of,

"given the advancement of modern day sensors, resolution, noise handling and noise reduction in post processing, if you're finding ISO1000 from this given camera unusable, you'll have a difficult time finding anything acceptable from most modern cameras, with possibly the exception of on the most expensive cameras that Nikon and Canon have to offer".

However, most of us are adults, and most of us know that I'm not some dick trying to talk people or their work down. Rather than offer a rambling sentence of drek, I called it. Just like I seen it. If I ruffled a few feathers, that's okay, whatever has to happen can happen.




Dec 12, 2011 at 01:42 AM
gdanmitchell
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #8 · p.3 #8 · 7D noise issue


Imagemaster wrote:
Oh yeah, 7D is really bad for noise. It takes no time at all in PP to handle noise, when there is any to handle.

First three shots are at ISO 1600 and last one at ISO 800.



Your excellent bird photographs illustrate several things, I think:

1. It is always worth it to ask a poster to provide an actual sample of an image with the "noise problem." More often than not there is an objective explanation of the issue. Sometimes there is a technical cause... and sometimes the person is simply obsessing over something that won't even be visible in the final photographic output in electronic or print form.

2. Speaking of which, while I can see noise in your bird photographs in the smooth gradient background areas, I consider that a total non-issue. There is nothing wrong with a very small amount of noise, and there are even valid arguments that it can bee a good thing.

3. Having shot a full frame camera at 800-3200 ISO, there will be visible noise, and even a bit more so on crop. But post-process noise reduction can deal with this to a great extent. (And notice that the term is noise reduction, not noise elimination.

Regarding criticism of camera performance - 7D or others - there is a lot of noxious and silly spewage on camera forums in general. I suspect that a lot of it - though perhaps not quite all - may come from people who focus too much on looking for "problems" that turn out to not really be problems at all in actual photography and actual photographs.

Dan



Dec 12, 2011 at 01:44 AM
galenapass
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #9 · p.3 #9 · 7D noise issue


I had a 7D and a MKIII for comparison during a 3 week period. After a lot of test shots at a nearby pond I found the 7D noise to be too objectionable when compared with the MKIII. Mostly I could not personally tolerate the noise in what has been termed smooth gradient backgrounds, e.g., sections of the photo which contained sky were quite noisy even at 200 ISO. I did resize images when making the comparison. My conclusion was to sell the 7D and save money towards a MKIV while shooting with the MKIII. Obviously 7D shots can be made to look better with PP; however, I prefer save my PP time for when I really need it such as shooting at > 1600 ISO. The amount of 7D noise at lower ISO, while fixable as demonstrated above, limits the use of this camera for me when shooting in low light situations where even higher ISO is required. I am going to watch patiently and hopefully for the next generation of crop cameras.



Dec 12, 2011 at 02:38 AM
Imagemaster
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #10 · p.3 #10 · 7D noise issue


I found less noise in the Mk3 images, but at the same time found them to look a bit more "smeared" than those of the 7D. Probably because the noise is suppressed more inside the Mk3? Besides, for my type of photography, I prefer the extra reach of the 7D.


Dec 12, 2011 at 02:52 AM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



galenapass
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #11 · p.3 #11 · 7D noise issue


For my needs I agree about the reach, which is why I really wanted to like the 7D. In fact, I may give the 7D another shot (so to speak) because I bought a 2X III TC and I don't like the results that come out of it on my 500mm. A 7D + 1.4X would more than likely perform much better.


Dec 12, 2011 at 02:58 AM
Pixel Perfect
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #12 · p.3 #12 · 7D noise issue


galenapass wrote:
I had a 7D and a MKIII for comparison during a 3 week period. After a lot of test shots at a nearby pond I found the 7D noise to be too objectionable when compared with the MKIII. Mostly I could not personally tolerate the noise in what has been termed smooth gradient backgrounds, e.g., sections of the photo which contained sky were quite noisy even at 200 ISO. I did resize images when making the comparison. My conclusion was to sell the 7D and save money towards a MKIV while shooting with the MKIII. Obviously 7D shots can be
...Show more

But this is what we've been arguing about, a normal 7D should not be producing objectionable amounts of noise in a sky at ISO 200. If it is there's something wrong with the camera as I think you'd know how to expose it correctly. I only use very light NR at the RAW conversion stage with 7D at ISO 200 and the skies look fine. I don't think I have the highest standards in the world by any stretch, but I don't think I'm accepting anything someone else would throw out either; I sort of obsess about clean skies but in prints the small amount of grain you might see at 100% view, is absent.

I also own a 1D III to compare to and although 1D III is cleaner at pixel level, resized to 7D size, or vice versa, shows the 7D isn't much different at all.



Dec 12, 2011 at 02:58 AM
Pixel Perfect
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #13 · p.3 #13 · 7D noise issue


BrianO wrote:
I like all of your shots here, but this one is my favorite. Absolutely stunning.


Thanks Brian. I like this shot too, it was only about 30 minutes before sunset. I like how his feet had sunk into the sand.



Dec 12, 2011 at 03:12 AM
BrianO
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #14 · p.3 #14 · 7D noise issue


Pixel Perfect wrote:
...a normal 7D should not be producing objectionable amounts of noise in a sky at ISO 200. If it is there's something wrong with the camera.


I wonder if there's been a change to firmware -- or even hardware -- in recent models. It seems that the people with noise problems have been mostly those with older cameras.

I also see in perusing the menus of my new 7D that there is adjustment for built-in noise reduction levels, and I'm sure that can have a significant effect on in-camera JPEGs. I'll have to play with that for a while.



Dec 12, 2011 at 03:58 AM
RobertLynn
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #15 · p.3 #15 · 7D noise issue


BrianO wrote:
I wonder if there's been a change to firmware -- or even hardware -- in recent models. It seems that the people with noise problems have been mostly those with older cameras.

I also see in perusing the menus of my new 7D that there is adjustment for built-in noise reduction levels, and I'm sure that can have a significant effect on in-camera JPEGs. I'll have to play with that for a while.



I get my best results using NR in LR, and there's nothing I'm doing scientific, you know? Just like, slide the lum slider up however many points until it's too far, then back off.

I've NEVER been happy with the in camera jpeg processing for noise.



Dec 12, 2011 at 04:00 AM
RobertLynn
Offline
• • • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #16 · p.3 #16 · 7D noise issue


BrianO wrote:
I wonder if there's been a change to firmware -- or even hardware -- in recent models. It seems that the people with noise problems have been mostly those with older cameras.

I also see in perusing the menus of my new 7D that there is adjustment for built-in noise reduction levels, and I'm sure that can have a significant effect on in-camera JPEGs. I'll have to play with that for a while.



I get my best results using NR in LR, and there's nothing I'm doing scientific, you know? Just like, slide the lum slider up however many points until it's too far, then back off.

I've NEVER been happy with the in camera jpeg processing for noise.



Dec 12, 2011 at 04:00 AM
Pixel Perfect
Offline
• • • • • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #17 · p.3 #17 · 7D noise issue


RobertLynn wrote:
I get my best results using NR in LR, and there's nothing I'm doing scientific, you know? Just like, slide the lum slider up however many points until it's too far, then back off.

I've NEVER been happy with the in camera jpeg processing for noise.


The sharpening sliders are also essential to get the best results. The defaults aren't that good.



Dec 12, 2011 at 05:44 AM
BrianO
Offline
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #18 · p.3 #18 · 7D noise issue


RobertLynn wrote:
I get my best results using NR in LR, and there's nothing I'm doing scientific, you know? Just like, slide the lum slider up however many points until it's too far, then back off.


Pixel Perfect wrote:
The sharpening sliders are also essential to get the best results. The defaults aren't that good.


Good to know. I've asked Santa to bring me Lightroom for Christmas.



Dec 12, 2011 at 09:36 AM
David Baldwin
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.3 #19 · p.3 #19 · 7D noise issue


Gochugogi

"Also, those of us that shot film are probably more tolerant of noise in defocused backgrounds and skies. I prefer a wee bit of grainy texture in my images over perfectly smooth and noiseless."

I agree completely. A bit of grain or "noise" can often be very "graphic" and pleasing IMHO. I still look back to Tri-X and HP5 with nostalgia.

It often surprises me how often on FM people are denigrated for being "pixel peepers", yet at the same time there are so many photographers who apparently cannot tolerate any noise at all in their images which to my mind is a far more unreasonable mindset. If you are using a small hand held camera for fast action photography you will get noise. If your subject is static, dial the lowest ISO you can and use a tripod and you won't get any noise at all. Photography has always been about technical tradeoffs, and today's cameras are so much better than anything we had in the past.

As I said, its subjective how much noise is OK. Speaking personally if I need super AF I use my 7D even if I have to crank up the ISO to the point it gets grainy. If I don't need top notch AF I reach for the 5D2 which has better IQ than the 7D. There are times when each camera can secure images the other couldn't.



Dec 12, 2011 at 11:04 AM
misterphil
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.3 #20 · p.3 #20 · 7D noise issue


To the OP,
Others here have shown some fine photos taken with the 7D and if you are still getting problems with your 7D at 400 ISO and you don't know why, it may be worth you having the camera checked out at Canon. They will confirm if there is a fault with your camera. Alternatively you could post some examples here as evidence to be cross examined!
Either way I hope you find a solution quickly.
All the best



Dec 12, 2011 at 11:33 AM
1       2      
3
       4              6       7       end






FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1       2      
3
       4              6       7       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Reset password