Home · Register · Search · View Winners · Software · Hosting · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  

FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
  

Archive 2011 · Portait tele: 100L vs 135L...please read
  
 
Gib Robinson
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.2 #1 · Portait tele: 100L vs 135L...please read


Tenn.Jer wrote:
I only recently (last summer, anyway) upgraded my trusty 100mm 2.8 USM Macro to the newer L version, and I had to rent one twice before I could make up my mind. The IS is what eventually shifted my thinking, because the IQ difference between the two was virtually indistinguishable...Yet, I found myself doing more "spontaneous" style macro shooting, where I wanted to catch a butterfly on a flower or somesuch, a situation that precluded the use of tripod, mirror lockup, remote release, and all those painstaking tricks that produce perfectly sharp macro/close up frames...so, I could at last justify
...Show more

+1

The 100 f/2.8 macro IS is a wonderful lens and with IS works well indoors. I find I can photograph people at very low shutter speeds because I can usually anticipate when they will be still enough.

The 85 f/1.8 is a good second option if, as you say, you like shallow DOF.

--Gib




Dec 08, 2011 at 05:48 AM
1      
2
       end




FM Forums | Canon Forum | Join Upload & Sell

1      
2
       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Retrive password