sebboh Offline Upload & Sell: Off
|
carstenw wrote:
I am on a 30" screen, 2560x1600 and some of the panoramas in this thread run off the right edge by quite a margin, maybe 40%, when my browser is full screen. This completely ruins my impression of the image as a whole, since I can only see a small chunk of it at a time, and imagine how people browsing on 15" and 17" laptops feel. Other panoramas here are maybe 600 wide, just thumbnail size, unless you click on to another site. This means that I have no way to just scroll down and see various panoramas, one after the other. I have to click a bunch and scroll a bunch, and honestly, if a panorama doesn't have anything at 1200 wide, it just won't be effective on any screen, and should be put on a wall.
I think I will go start my own thread on getdpi with 1200 wide panoramas. I find that the presentation differences here totally ruin the experience.
Sorry to sound so harsh, but it is just the way I feel (for this thread only)....Show more →
i totally disagree, there is no point in making a panorama to display it at only 1200 pixels wide. why bother stitching if your going to display it at such a tiny size, just use a p&s. panoramas should be panned through by the viewer e.g. you should need to turn your head to take it all in on print (just like the actual scenery) or scroll through on a computer monitor (obviously the print way is better but impossible over the good ol' tubal interweb). i find scrolling through a panorama much preferible to looking at something that is only 200 pixels tall.
just my opinion, but i don't think i would get past the first page of such a thread.
anyway here are a couple panos that actually fit you're criteria since they were not meant to be particularly epic. both were shot on the rokinon 85/1.4 wide open just as proof of concept.
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5145/5644798870_9771b1af87_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2068/5696269378_66dbc790a7_b.jpg
|