Home · Register · Software · Software · Join Upload & Sell

Moderated by: Fred Miranda
Username   Password

  New fredmiranda.com Mobile Site
  New Feature: SMS Notification alert
  New Feature: Buy & Sell Watchlist
  

FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              171      
172
       173              249       250       end
  

Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion
  
 
bruniroquai
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #1 · p.172 #1 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion




One question guys!

I'm between the 5D or the D700 just for portraits, with a good 85/135 but.. my main concern are.. Focussing screen, EG-S or there is out there some good Focus screen for the d700, same as the EGS?
85 the 1.4G is a beast, fantastic but it has not the soul of the Zeiss.. and the 85L? Pfff.. too big I think and Canon focus.. well We know.

So. D700 with the 85 ZF.2 , good enough even wide open to make 50x70cm prints and would be possible change the normal Focus Screen for a good one as Canon has?

Thanks!



Jun 11, 2013 at 08:37 AM
wfrank
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #2 · p.172 #2 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


Why not go Canon 5D2 with 21 MP instead of those two with 12? If so you could skip ZE/ZF and go for the original, C/Y Contax Zeiss Planar 85/1.4 which is as good or better for those that notice the difference. But it is a dangerous road, there's a whole bunch of great C/Y's out there waiting..

For Nikon I hear some people put the Canon EG-S into their cams so I guess it works, but it is not supported and I think it needs some alteration of the screen.




Jun 11, 2013 at 11:50 AM
bruniroquai
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #3 · p.172 #3 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


Are You sure the C/Y is good or better than the new ZE?


Jun 11, 2013 at 02:58 PM
wfrank
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #4 · p.172 #4 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


Well some would argue that generally the ZEs would be marginally better corrected for various optic deficiencies, have slightly "sharper" MTFs and that newer is always better. And you get a guarantee too. Others would say that the CY have more character, delivers more 3D, better colors and that their build has proven its perfection over time. And one thing that matters to me is that the ZEs have electronic aperture, something which will render them useless for that future upcoming mirrorless FF - whereas the CYs will shine even more than before :-)

But even though I have a bunch of CYs and just one ZE I would be (almost) as happy IQ-wise if it was the other way around.



Jun 11, 2013 at 03:14 PM
mpmendenhall
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #5 · p.172 #5 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


bruniroquai wrote:
Are You sure the C/Y is good or better than the new ZE?


You can go to the Zeiss download center to see what Zeiss' own data sheets say about the lenses. Here's a quick overlay of the CY and ZE MTFs at f1.4; CY = thicker lines, ZE = thinner lines:





For medium and fine detail wide open, the CY actually pulls a bit ahead over most of the frame. Here's the overlay at f5.6:





The ZE has a central frame sharpness/resolution advantage, but over most of the image area the CY again comes out ahead. Even in raw MTF terms (setting aside any preferences for the charming rendering character of the old lenses), the CY's are often as good or better than their modern counterparts (at least in some ways).

I also personally prefer the build quality and design of the older CY lenses. Of course, you lose auto-aperture (but gain a physical aperture ring on the lens, which I like).



Jun 11, 2013 at 03:21 PM
bruniroquai
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #6 · p.172 #6 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


But.. that is not desirable in portraits? Sharp in the center going softer in the edges?


Jun 11, 2013 at 05:15 PM
wfrank
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #7 · p.172 #7 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


Nice graphs mpmendenhall, never seen it done like that.





Jun 11, 2013 at 05:25 PM
mpmendenhall
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #8 · p.172 #8 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


bruniroquai wrote:
But.. that is not desirable in portraits? Sharp in the center going softer in the edges?


Poorer peripheral sharpness is often considered less problematic for portrait applications, but is unlikely to be considered a positive lens attribute. With a fast lens like this, you generally let the shallow depth of field and subject/background separation provide soft backgrounds around an in-focus subject, rather than relying on poor lens performance to smear out in-focal-plane edge areas. You might not always want portraits with the subject right at the center; and a "portrait" lens can be used for more than portraits. Both the CY and ZE lens are perfectly good lenses, and for particular subjects (and matters of taste), a (slight) advantage could go to either one (and, in most cases, they will be hard to tell apart at all). However, the MTF comparison between the old and new lenses indicates that the old CY is in no general way optically inferior to its ZE counterpart.


Edited on Jun 11, 2013 at 05:46 PM · View previous versions



Jun 11, 2013 at 05:44 PM
Ronny Olsson
Online
• • • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #9 · p.172 #9 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


Great shot craig


Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 100mm f/2 ZF by Ronny Olsson, on Flickr




Jun 11, 2013 at 05:45 PM
Lieutenant Z
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.172 #10 · p.172 #10 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


Bad shot Ronny : not sharp in the corners !


Jun 11, 2013 at 05:51 PM
 

Search in Used Dept. 



bruniroquai
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #11 · p.172 #11 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


mpmendenhall wrote:
Poorer peripheral sharpness is often considered less problematic for portrait applications, but is unlikely to be considered a positive lens attribute. With a fast lens like this, you generally let the shallow depth of field and subject/background separation provide soft backgrounds around an in-focus subject, rather than relying on poor lens performance to smear out in-focal-plane edge areas. You might not always want portraits with the subject right at the center; and a "portrait" lens can be used for more than portraits. Both the CY and ZE lens are perfectly good lenses, and for particular subjects (and matters of taste),
...Show more


Thank You!

So.. where can I find one in EU?

BTW, 100mm F2 Contax Planar over the 85 1.4? 100 MP too expensive right now..



Jun 11, 2013 at 05:58 PM
mpmendenhall
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #12 · p.172 #12 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


bruniroquai wrote:
So.. where can I find one in EU?


I don't know many places in the EU, but Ffordes often has a good selection (and prices sometimes worth overseas shipping). They don't appear to have any 85/1.4's in stock right now, but a bunch of 100/2's; be patient, and they will eventually show up. There's also eBay, and I'm sure a lot more local EU shops that I don't know about.


BTW, 100mm F2 Contax Planar over the 85 1.4?

Matter of personal preference and comfortability with the focal length. 100/2 will be more expensive (and a little bigger/heavier), and a bit harder to hand-hold in lower light (slower aperture, longer focal length), but it's one of my favorite lenses (and preferable to the 85/1.4 range to me). 100/2 will provide extremely uniform image quality --- no sharpness falloff at all towards edges/corners --- and a very clearly delineated plane of focus. Shooting a longer lens with a slower aperture can provide more depth-of-field on the in-focus subject for the same amount of far-background blurring; so in portraiture, for example, you won't have so much of "one eye in focus, other blurry" while keeping the subject sharply separated from the background.



Jun 11, 2013 at 06:17 PM
bruniroquai
Offline
• •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #13 · p.172 #13 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


Mmm.. and the 100 is even better than the 85 ZE?


Jun 11, 2013 at 06:56 PM
mpmendenhall
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #14 · p.172 #14 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


bruniroquai wrote:
Mmm.. and the 100 is even better than the 85 ZE?


I wouldn't absolutely say "better," but different. The CY 100/2 at f2 is going to provide a sharper, clearer image than the 85/1.4 (either version) at f1.4, while providing a similar amount of subject isolation from far backgrounds --- a feature of the longer focal length. When operated at equal f-numbers, the 85/1.4 may come out a bit ahead (MTFs show the 85/1.4 generally doing better at f5.6 than the 100/2 at f5.6).

I have a personal preference for the more tele-compressed images from longer focal lengths, with increased on-subject depth of field and improved optical characteristics of working at slower apertures, while still providing plenty of subject isolation. On the other hand, if you prefer the "look" of a shorter/faster lens --- more background context in the frame, ultra-thin DOF on the subject --- then an 85/1.4 might be better for you.

What's you're intended use for the lens? Do you need/want extra speed for lower-light handheld shots? Is portraiture your main intent, or other uses too? I'd suggest searching these forums and the web for images with each lens, to see whether you prefer one particular style or another.



Jun 11, 2013 at 08:17 PM
sculptormic
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.172 #15 · p.172 #15 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


For the more fortunate lovers of fast Zeiss glass!

http://www.ebay.de/itm/Zeiss-Contax-Anniversary-Collection-Planar-T-1-2-55-1-2-85-2-135-/300914516085?clk_rvr_id=489673791860



Jun 11, 2013 at 09:18 PM
wfrank
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #16 · p.172 #16 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


sculptormic wrote:
For the more fortunate lovers of fast Zeiss glass!

http://www.ebay.de/itm/Zeiss-Contax-Anniversary-Collection-Planar-T-1-2-55-1-2-85-2-135-/300914516085?clk_rvr_id=489673791860


jeez. And that is just a starting prize.



Jun 11, 2013 at 09:44 PM
Mescalamba
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #17 · p.172 #17 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


That 135/2 is bit "not needed", but those two others were made only in this collection if Im correct. There is one owner of 85/1,2 here on FM.


Jun 11, 2013 at 09:46 PM
sculptormic
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.172 #18 · p.172 #18 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


His other auctions are also worth looking. All top notch stuff.


Jun 11, 2013 at 09:51 PM
mpmendenhall
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: Off
p.172 #19 · p.172 #19 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


sculptormic wrote:
For the more fortunate lovers of fast Zeiss glass!

http://www.ebay.de/itm/Zeiss-Contax-Anniversary-Collection-Planar-T-1-2-55-1-2-85-2-135-/300914516085?clk_rvr_id=489673791860


The more fortunate lovers of fast Zeiss glass are the ones who already have these in their collection. The less fortunate lovers of fast Zeiss glass are the ones who have just been impelled to count how many internal organs they can sell in the next 11.5 hours. At least the shipping is cheap!



Jun 11, 2013 at 10:16 PM
sculptormic
Offline
• • • •
Upload & Sell: On
p.172 #20 · p.172 #20 · Zeiss Lens Photos and Discussion


mpmendenhall wrote:
The more fortunate lovers of fast Zeiss glass are the ones who already have these in their collection. The less fortunate lovers of fast Zeiss glass are the ones who have just been impelled to count how many internal organs they can sell in the next 11.5 hours. At least the shipping is cheap!






Jun 11, 2013 at 10:52 PM
1       2       3              171      
172
       173              249       250       end






FM Forums | Alternative Gear & Lenses | Join Upload & Sell

1       2       3              171      
172
       173              249       250       end
    
 

You are not logged in. Login or Register

Username   Password    Reset password