Upload & Sell: Off
I used to have the Zeiss (my first copy was broken, but Zeiss replaced it
and my 2nd copy was as good as yours), now I shoot with the Leica.
IMO, your examples are not difficult enough and don't show a scene where
the difference in rendering would be easily seen.
Those two shots are showing some difference, take a look at
the amount of CA in the leaves and check out the lower left corner,
it's not only the sharpness, but the separation of the reds and greens:
IMO Leica is just great to render difficult color situation, mostly deep greens
vs deep blue sky. Red is also rendered differently.
The separation and contrast makes this lens quite unique IMO.
When I shoot with it I'm almost always amazed at the way it renders the image.
I never had that impression with my Zeiss.
I think you should try to go into a forest and shoot it agains the Zeiss
in some more difficult situations.
I agree the sharpness might be closed in the city, although Leica
is better wide open in my opinion.
Also CA is very well controlled comparing to Zeiss, which is famous for large
amount of CA when shot wide open (every Zeiss).
Zeiss is better for the closed subjects, has a very short min focus distance.
A few Leica examples to try to show what I'm talking about...
Look at this silly shot taken yesterday, look how reds nicely rendered against the bg:
This is an example of Leica 28 look, quite hard to describe:
A couple of forest shots: