Isca Offline Buy and Sell: On
|
p.1 #2 · Wide Takumars on 1DsII? | |
The 35/3.5 is awful in my opinion. The 28/3.5 is better but doesn't compare to the Zeiss 28/2.8 by all accounts. then again, it's about $40 compared to $240 
I don't know about the 24 but I understand the Takumar 35/2 is pretty good but the price is getting up there, $70+ I believe. For that price, if you are convinced you want to stay with a M42 mount lens then I'd go with the Flektogon 35/2.4.
Take a look here for the Flek vs the Takumar 35/3.5 and the Canon 35L, you'll see how well it holds up. The 35L wins but it's a $100 or less lens vs a $1,000 lens. All taken with a 5D, centre and edge 100% crops.
http://www.pbase.com/garethc/35mm_tests&page=all
Edited on Feb 22, 2006 at 07:50 PM
|